Use this searchbox to search JudicialCaselaw.com for more interesting court decisions.

Clervrain et al v. Golden et al (3:22-cv-00110-JRG-JEM)

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee

Share on Social Media

Clervrain et al v. Golden et al (3:22-cv-00110-JRG-JEM)

Follow on Feedly for case updates: follow us on feedly

RSS: RSS Feed Icon

  • ORDER: After consideration of the record as a whole and after careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and for the reasons set out in that Report and Recommendation which are inc orporated by reference herein, it is hereby ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 16] is ADOPTED and APPROVED, and that the Plaintiff's Complaint be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Accordingly, the dozen motions Plaintiff filed alongside his Complaint [Docs. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15] are DENIED. Signed by District Judge J Ronnie Greer on 05/13/2022. (Copy of Order mailed to Manetirony Clervrain) (AMP)

  • REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Plaintiffs Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Document 1) well taken, and it is GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to file the Complaint (Document 2) in this case without prepayment of costs or fees. However, no process shall issue until the District Judge has ruled upon this Report and Recommendation, because it is RECOMMENDED that the Complaint be DISMISSED in its entirety such that none of the claims or pending motions proceed beyond the initial screening phase, as Plaintiff has failed to state a plausible claim for relief and the action appears to be frivolous.Signed by US Magistrate Judge Jill E McCook on 4/25/22. (c/m to Manetirony Clervrain, 4326 S Scatterfield Road, Suite 153, Anderson, IN 46013)(ABF)

Use this searchbox to search JudicialCaselaw.com for more interesting court decisions.

Clervrain et al v. Golden et al (3:22-cv-00110-JRG-JEM)

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee

Share this with your network