Use this searchbox to search JudicialCaselaw.com for more interesting court decisions.

Erickson v. Nooth (2:09-cv-01227-SU)

U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon

Share on Social Media

Erickson v. Nooth (2:09-cv-01227-SU)

Follow on Feedly for case updates: follow us on feedly

RSS: RSS Feed Icon

  • Opinion and Order - The court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's F & R (Document 47) . The Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Document 42) is dismissed with prejudice. The Motion for Discovery (Document 46) is DENIED. The court declines to issue a Certificate of Appealability, on the ground that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right pursuant to 28 US.c. § 2253 (c)(2). Signed on 5/2/12 by Judge Michael H. Simon. (mja)

  • Findings & Recommendation: The Motion for Discovery (Document 46) and the Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Document 42) should be DENIED. In addition, the court should enter a judgment dismissing this case with prejudice, and decline to issu e a Certificate of Appealability on the basis that petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Objections, if any, to the Findings and Recommendation are due by 3/26/2012. Signed on 3/9/2012 by Magistrate Judge Patricia Sullivan. (jtj)

Use this searchbox to search JudicialCaselaw.com for more interesting court decisions.

Erickson v. Nooth (2:09-cv-01227-SU)

U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon

Share this with your network