Use this searchbox to search JudicialCaselaw.com for more interesting court decisions.

Wen v. Hair Party 24 Hours Inc. et al (1:15-cv-10186-ER-DCF)

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Share on Social Media

Wen v. Hair Party 24 Hours Inc. et al (1:15-cv-10186-ER-DCF)

Follow on Feedly for case updates: follow us on feedly

RSS: RSS Feed Icon

Related Cases: 1:15-cv-10186-ER

  • SCHEDULING ORDER FOR A DAMAGES INQUEST: Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:1. If Defendants wish to contest the amounts being requested by Plaintiff, then, no later than February 24, 2020, they shall submit to the Court their responses to the da mages calculations and the fee application that are set out in Plaintiff's motion for a default judgment. 2. Defendants Hair Party and Hair 24 are cautioned that, as corporate entities, they may not appear in this Court without an attorney. For this reason, any response to Plaintiffs damages/fee submissions that they may wish to file, including any request for a hearing on damages, must be made through counsel, in order for that response to be considered by the Court. (as further set forth herein). Plaintiff is directed to serve a copy of this Order on Defendants and to file proof of service no later than January 31, 2020. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman on 1/24/2020) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (kv)

  • ORDER: Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for default judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to refer this matter to the assigned magistrate judge, Judge Debra C. Freeman, for an inquest into damages and proper attorneys' fees. It is SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 12/6/2019) (kv)

Use this searchbox to search JudicialCaselaw.com for more interesting court decisions.

Wen v. Hair Party 24 Hours Inc. et al (1:15-cv-10186-ER-DCF)

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Share this with your network