ORDER: The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff's letter to the undersigned dated March 10, 2020 (Dkt. 248). Plaintiff's request to hold the pending motion to dismiss in abeyance and to open an investigation into Defendant's productio n of a medical document is DENIED. The document issue (concerning a dental appointment) has been repeatedly addressed and resolved in prior orders. Despite having been provided a previous extension to respond to the pending motion to dismiss, Plaint iff has not filed any opposition to the motion, the extended deadline for which was March 10, 2020. Instead, on that day, Plaintiff filed two letters to Judge Ramos as well as the letter that is the subject of this order. Plaintiff did not request a second extension and evidently had the time to compose and file three separate letters to the Court rather than file opposition to the motion. Accordingly, the Court will proceed with resolving the motion to dismiss. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger on 3/12/2020) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (rro)
Mar 12, 2020
Click Below To View Another Page
Use this searchbox to search JudicialCaselaw.com for more interesting court decisions.
Workneh v. Super Shuttle International Inc. (1:15-cv-03521-ER-RWL)
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York