Use this searchbox to search JudicialCaselaw.com for more interesting court decisions.

In re: Aluminum Warehousing Antitrust Litigation (1:13-md-02481-PAE)

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Share on Social Media

In re: Aluminum Warehousing Antitrust Litigation (1:13-md-02481-PAE)

Follow on Feedly for case updates: follow us on feedly

RSS: RSS Feed Icon

Related Cases: 1:13-md-02481-KBF

  • ORDER with respect to (1212) Letter Motion for Discovery in case 1:13-md-02481-PAE; with respect to (143) Letter Motion for Discovery in case 1:14-cv-06849-PAE: The Court cannot, on these submissions, reliably determine its jurisdiction over the & #167; 1782(a) petition. The Court accordingly directs Kodak to submit a supplemental letter of no more than 4 pages that: (1) lists the specific persons (or corporate entities) from whom it seeks discovery pursuant to § 1782; (2) sets forth the bases for jurisdiction against each person from whom discovery is sought under del Valle Ruiz; and (3) addresses whether the Court's jurisdiction is impacted by the fact of its presiding over this MDL, see 28 U.S.C. § 1407(b) (allowing dist rict judge overseeing MDL to "exercise the powers of a district judge in any district" for pretrial proceedings), and/or the fact of defendants' participation therein. Kodak's letter is due Friday, January 24, 2020. Defendants ma y submit a response, also of no more than 4 pages, to the narrow issues presented in Kodaks supplemental letter by Tuesday, January 28, 2020. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 1/21/2020) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:13-md-02481-PAE, 1:14-cv-06849-PAE (jwh)

  • ORDER: The Court hereby schedules the next telephonic conference in this case for Thursday, February 20, 2020, at 9 a.m. The Court directs lead counsel for plaintiffs to provide the Court and the defense with a dial-in number for the call. The Court further directs that, two days prior to the call, counsel submit a brief joint letter summarizing recent developments in the case and identifying the call participants for each side. (Telephone Conference set for 2/20/2020 at 09:00 AM before Judge Paul A. Engelmayer.) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 1/17/2020) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:13-md-02481-PAE et al.(jwh)

  • ORDER: The Court has received the First Level Purchaser Plaintiffs' email in response to the Court's December 9, 2019 Order regarding the redaction of certain documents. The Court has reviewed and approves of the First Level Purchaser Plain tiffs' proposed redactions to Exhibits 1A and 1B to the Declaration of Carmen A. Medici. The Court thanks counsel for reaching an agreement as to the public filing of the remaining documents referenced in the First Level Purchaser Plaintiffs' response to defendants' sur-reply in opposition to the class certification motion. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 12/17/2019) (jwh)

  • ORDER: For the reasons set forth on the record of today's telephonic conference, the First Level Purchaser Plaintiffs' letter regarding sur-reply expert declarations is due Wednesday, December 11, 2019. Defendants' response is due Monday, December 16, 2019. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 12/6/2019) (jwh)

  • ORDER: The Court has reviewed and approves of defendants' proposed redactions to the Declaration of David P. Kaplan, to Exhibits A, H, J, and K thereto, and to Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of John S. Playforth. Defendants may file the redacted versions on ECF and file the unredacted versions under seal. The Court appreciates defendants' diligence in responding to its concerns regarding filing under seal. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 11/19/2019) (mro)

  • ORDER: At the November 4, 2019 conference in this multi-district litigation, the Court advised counsel of its intention to have a monthly telephone conference with counsel. The purpose of the conference is to keep the Court abreast of relevant develo pments in the litigation and to give the Court a forum to inquire about such matters with counsel. The Court hereby schedules the first such conference for Friday, December 6, 2019, at 9 a.m. The Court directs lead counsel for plaintiffs to provide t he Court and the defense with a dial-in number for the call. Although other counsel on the case are of course welcome to audit the call, the Court expects that no more than three lawyers per side will participate on the call. The Court directs that, two days prior to the call, counsel submit a brief joint letter summarizing recent developments in the case and identifying the call participants for each side. (Telephone Conference set for 12/6/2019 at 09:00 AM before Judge Paul A. Engelmayer.) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 11/19/2019) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:13-md-02481-PAE et al.(jwh)

Use this searchbox to search JudicialCaselaw.com for more interesting court decisions.

In re: Aluminum Warehousing Antitrust Litigation (1:13-md-02481-PAE)

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Share this with your network