Use this searchbox to search JudicialCaselaw.com for more interesting court decisions.

Charnesky v. Piper et al (0:18-cv-02748-ECT-KMM)

U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota

Share on Social Media

Charnesky v. Piper et al (0:18-cv-02748-ECT-KMM)

Follow on Feedly for case updates: follow us on feedly

RSS: RSS Feed Icon

  • OPINION AND ORDER: Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Document 93) is GRANTED, the stay of discovery [ (Document 85) at 26] remains in effect, Plaintiff's motion (Document 106) to appeal or for reconsideration of the September 6, 2019 order denying her earlier motion to recuse is DENIED, and within 30 days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff may file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies identified in this opinion with respect to her ADA retaliation claim. See Order for specifics. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Eric C. Tostrud on 12/2/2019. (RMM)

  • MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting (Document 45) Defendant Frederick Suhler's Motion to Dismiss/General; granting (Document 52) Defendant Judith Teed's Motion to Dismiss/General; granting (Document 54) Defendant Susan Jenkin, M.D.'s Motion to Dismiss/General; granting (Document 67) Olmstead County Defendants' Motion to Dismiss/General; denying (Document 6) Plaintiff Charnesky's Motion to Unseal the Complaint; denying as moot (Document 15) DHS Defendants' Motion to Dismiss/General; denying Plaintiff Charnesky's oral motion to amend her complaint. See Order for additional deadlines and specifics. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Eric C. Tostrud on 4/5/2019. (RMM) cc: Charnesky. (kt)

Use this searchbox to search JudicialCaselaw.com for more interesting court decisions.

Charnesky v. Piper et al (0:18-cv-02748-ECT-KMM)

U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota

Share this with your network