IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA       v.   BRANDON GLEN JACKSON,    Defendant.  Criminal No.: ELH-22-141     MEMORANDUM OPINION  The dispute at issue has been spawned by the Supreme Court’s recent decision in New York  State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, ___ U.S. ___, 142 S. Ct. 2111 (2022). In light of  Bruen, the Court must determine whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(n) — a statute enacted decades ago —  violates the Second Amendment to the Constitution. The statute makes it illegal for a person under  indictment for an offense punishable by imprisonment for a term of one year or more to transport  or receive any firearm or ammunition that has travelled in interstate commerce.  A grand jury in the District of Maryland has charged defendant Brandon Glen Jackson with  a violation of § 922(n), based on his alleged transportation of a firearm from Arizona to Maryland  while he was under indictment in Arizona for a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term  exceeding one year. ECF 17. Pursuant toBruen, Jackson has filed a “Motion to Dismiss the  Indictment Under the Second Amendment.” ECF 34 (the “Motion”). The Motion includes several  exhibits. The government opposes the Motion (ECF 37, the “Opposition”), and Jackson has  replied. ECF 39 (the “Reply”).  Case 1:22-cr-00141-ELH Document 66 Filed 03/13/23 Page 1 of 35