3    (citingPeer v. First Fed. Sav. and Loan Ass'n of Cumberland,273  Md. 610, 331 A.2d 299, 301 (1975)).”Spaulding v. Wells Fargo  Bank, N.A.,714 F.3d 769, 777 (4th Cir. 2013). An arbitration  agreement is supported by adequate consideration where both  parties agree to be bound by the arbitration process.Johnson v.  Circuit City Stores, 148 F.3d 373, 378 (4th Cir. 1998)(citingO’Neil  v. Hilton Head Hospital, 115 F.3d 272, 274 (4th Cir. 1997)).    The arbitration agreement (with its incorporated “Dispute  Resolution Booklet”) constitutes a contract, signed by Defendant  and, electronically, by Plaintiffs.2 Plaintiffs dispute the  validity and enforceability of the contract for three reasons:  they claim, first, that the contract is void because the material  terms were not disclosed to them; second, that the consideration  is lacking, and, third, that they have not been provided real  access to arbitration. (ECF No. 11).    The findings of fact refute the first argument. Based on the  evidence presented, the court found that all three plaintiffs had  the opportunity to read and review the documents prior to signing  and that, while it was a condition of continued employment that    2 At the hearing, Plaintiffs suggested that Maryland law did  not permit recognition of electronic signatures. They have not pursued that argument, however.  Case 1:20-cv-03533-DKC Document 36 Filed 10/19/21 Page 3 of 5

Document 40