3    RICHARD L. BOURGEOIS, JR. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE   Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend does not address whether the addition of either Turner or  CSI would destroy complete diversity in this action, and, if so, whether the Court should allow  joinder and remand the action.See28 U.S.C. § 1447(e) (“If after removal the plaintiff seeks to  join additional defendants whose joinder would destroy subject matter jurisdiction, the court may  deny joinder, or permit joinder and remand the action to the State court.”). Accordingly, the  Court will deny the instant motion without prejudice to refile.  Any renewed motion seeking to name Turner or CSI as a defendant must (1) identify the  citizenship of each proposed defendant, and (2) expressly state whether the motion is opposed.  If the addition of a new party would destroy diversity, the proposed motion must also specifically  address 28 U.S.C. § 1447(e) and the factors set forth inHensgens v. Deere & Co., 833 F.2d  1179, 1182 (5th Cir. 1987).  Based on the foregoing,  IT IS ORDEREDthat Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File First Supplemental and  Amended Complaint for Damages (R. Doc. 26) isDENIED. Any renewed motion must comply  with the body of this Order and should be filed on or beforeAugust 26, 2021.  Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on August 17, 2021.  S  Case 3:20-cv-00026-SDD-RLB Document 29 08/17/21 Page 3 of 3