UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA    TERRY  ELDRIDGE,    ) )  Petitioner,  )  vs.  ) 2:10-cv-192-JMS-DKL  )  SUPERINTENDENT, Putnamville  )  Correctional Facility,  )  )  Respondent.  )       E N T R Y      There was no error of law or of understanding the claims or the underlying  record in the recent denial of Terry Eldridge’s petition for writ of habeas corpus or the  denial of a certificate of appealability. No new evidence has been offered. Accordingly, the petitioner’s motion to alter or amend [31] isdenied.Harrington v.  City of Chicago,433 F.3d 542, 546 (7th Cir. 2006)(AAltering or amending a judgment under Rule 59(e) is permissible when there is newly discovered evidence or there has  been a manifest error of law or fact.@)(citingBordelon v. Chicago Sch. Reform Bd. of Trs.,233 F.3d 524, 529 (7th Cir. 2000)).     IT IS SO ORDERED.       Date: _________________        Distribution:   Terry Eldridge  #954923 Putnamville Correctional Facility  1946 West U.S. 40 Greencastle, IN 46135   james.martin@atg.in.gov      02/03/2012  _______________________________    Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Judge  United States District Court  Southern District of Indiana  Case 2:10-cv-00192-JMS-DKL Document 32 Filed 02/03/12 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 385