Use this searchbox to search JudicialCaselaw.com for more interesting court decisions.

THOMAS v. BRINKER et al (1:09-cv-01516-TWP-MJD)

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana

Share on Social Media

THOMAS v. BRINKER et al (1:09-cv-01516-TWP-MJD)

Follow on Feedly for case updates: follow us on feedly

RSS: RSS Feed Icon

  • ENTRY on Defendants' Motion to Use Specific Evidence - Defendants' Motion (Dkt. (Document 177) ) is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/2/2012. (See Entry for details) (TRG)

  • ENTRY on Supplemental Motion in Limine - Defendants' supplemental motion in limine (Dkt. (Document 172) ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/1/2012. (TRG)

  • ENTRY and Order on Final Pretrial Conference - Plaintiff appears by counsel Amy L. Cueller. Defendants appear by counsel Andrew R. Duncan, Beth Ann Dale, Clifford R. Whitehead, and John F. Kautzman. The Court Reporter is Fred Pratt. Jury trial r emains scheduled to commence on February 6, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 344. Defendants motion for a jury view (Dkt. (Document 146) ) is denied. The trial of this case was discussed, rulings made and directions given. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt. (See Entry for details)(TRG)

  • Entry on Defendants' Motion for Leave to File Answer - Defendants' Motion for Leave to File Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Dkt. (Document 125) ) is GRANTED. Clerk is directed to file Defendants' Answer. Defendants' motions in limine (Dkt. (Document 123) ) are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff's motions in limine (Dkt. (Document 116) ) are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt. (See Entry for details)(TRG)

  • ENTRY ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE - Given the unique posture of this case, where many of the motions in limine are contingent on the disposition of an unripe motion, the Court was unable to offer definitive rulings on many of the parties 9; motions. Therefore, the Court's entry on Defendants' Motion for Leave to File Answer and Affirmative Defense to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Dkt. (Document 125) ) will more thoroughly set out which motions in limine are granted and which are denied. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/13/2012.(JD)

  • ENTRY ON MOTION TO LIMIT TESTIMONY OF PLAINTIFF'S EXPERT - Defendants' Motion to Limit the Testimony of Dr. Villanustre (Dkt. (Document 104) ) is DENIED. Dr. Villanustre is permitted to offer testimony regarding causation and comparing Thomas's injuries to other dog bite injuries that he has seen. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/9/2012. (JD)

  • ENTRY ON MOTION TO DISMISS - For the reasons set forth, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. (Document 31) ) is GRANTED with respect to Thomas' claims that are being brought under the Indiana Constitution. The Motion to Dismiss is DENIED with respect to all other claims. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/28/2011. (JD)

Use this searchbox to search JudicialCaselaw.com for more interesting court decisions.

THOMAS v. BRINKER et al (1:09-cv-01516-TWP-MJD)

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana

Share this with your network