Use this searchbox to search JudicialCaselaw.com for more interesting court decisions.
Pacino v. Oliver et al (3:18-cv-06786-RS)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Share on Social Media
Pacino v. Oliver et al (3:18-cv-06786-RS)
Follow on Feedly for case updates:
RSS:
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/10/2023. (rslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2023)
Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND SCHEDULING SETTLEMENT STATUS CALL: By 11/21/2022, Defendant Oliver shall submit a statement explaining why sanctions should not be issued for the failure to appear. In addition, a 15-20 minute settlement status call wit h Plaintiff Pacino and counsel for Defendant Oliver shall take place on 11/28/2022 09:30 AM in Oakland, - Telephonic Only. Participants will receive call-in credentials by email. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 11/16/2022. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2022)
Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why stay should not be lifted. Hearing set for 6/30/2022 at 01:30 PM, by videoconference. Defendants' Response due by 6/2/2022, Plaintiff's response due by 6/16/2022. Signed by Chief Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/19/22. (rslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2022)
Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
Use this searchbox to search JudicialCaselaw.com for more interesting court decisions.
Pacino v. Oliver et al (3:18-cv-06786-RS)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Share this with your network
Judicial Caselaw
Judicial Caselaw is a resource for publicly available court filings