  4  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  United St  ates D  ist  ric  t C  ourt    Nor  ther  n Dist  ric  t of Calif  or  nia    months before his trial.Id.    Claim 3: Wilkins’s Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process and equal  protection were violated because he was denied a liberty interest granted under state law, to wit, California Penal Code § 1382, which provides for a state constitutional right to a speedy trial within 60 days.Id. at 37.    Claim 4: Wilkins’s Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process and equal  protection were violated because he was denied a fair trial based on the trial court’s refusal to grant a full and fair hearing on his motion to dismiss under California Penal Code § 825 for a delayed arraignment.Id. at 38-40.    Claim 5: Wilkins’s Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process and equal  protection were violated because of pre-arraignment delay and delayed arraignment.Id.    Claim 6: Wilkins’s Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process and equal  protection were violated because he was denied a liberty interest granted under California Penal Code §§ 1041-42 and Article I, § 16 of the California Constitution. Docket No. 45 at 41.    Claim 7: Wilkins’s Fifth Amendment right to be free from double jeopardy  was violated when further proceedings were held after the December 20, 2011 dismissal after the jury deadlocked.Id. at 51-53.    Claim 8: Wilkins’s Fourteenth Amendment rights to equal protection and due  process, and his Eighth Amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment, were violated because he was denied access to psychotropic medications that were necessary to maintain his competence to stand trial. Id. at 30-33.    Claim 9: Wilkins’s Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process and equal  protection, and his Sixth Amendment right to counsel, were violated when he was excluded from a May 2009in camerahearing where court-appointed counsel, Attorney Patrick Hetrick, was relieved from representation.Id. at 24- 25.    Claim 10: Wilkins’s Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process and equal  protection were violated due to prosecutorial misconduct based upon investigative misconduct, evidentiary irregularities, and misrepresentations made to defense counsel and the trial court.Id. at 42-44.    Claim 11: Wilkins’s Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process and equal  protection were violated when the prosecution failed to disclose and preserve evidence (i.e., two recordings) critical to the defense. Docket No. 45 at 45-46.    Claim 12: Wilkins’s Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process and equal  protection, and his Sixth Amendment right to counsel, were violated when the  Case 3:16-cv-00221-SI Document 58 Filed 05/08/18 Page 4 of 13