Use this searchbox to search JudicialCaselaw.com for more interesting court decisions.

USA v. Binford (1:20-cr-00150-ADA-BAM)

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California

Share on Social Media

USA v. Binford (1:20-cr-00150-ADA-BAM)

Follow on Feedly for case updates: follow us on feedly

RSS: RSS Feed Icon

Related Cases: 1:20-cr-00150-DAD-BAM

  • STIPULATION and ORDER TO VACATE CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING AND SET MOTION TO SUPPRESS HEARING as to Thomas Layman Binford signed by District Judge Ana de Alba on 2/2/2023. Change of Plea Hearing set for 2/6/2023 is VACATED. The Court sets a Motion to Suppress Hearing for 4/10/2023 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1 (ADA) before District Judge Ana de Alba. Defense Motion to be filed by 2/27/2023; Opposition Due 3/20/2023; Reply Brief Due 3/27/2023. (Hernandez, M)

  • STIPULATION and ORDER TO VACATE TRIAL CONFIRMATION AND TRIAL, SET CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING as to Thomas Layman Binford signed by District Judge Ana de Alba on 12/27/2022. Change of Plea Hearing set for 2/6/2023 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 1 (ADA) before District Judge Ana de Alba. Trial Confirmation Hearing set for 1/17/2023 and Jury Trial set for 1/31/2023 are VACATED. (Hernandez, M)

  • STIPULATION and ORDER to (1) Vacate September 14, 2022 Status Conference and (2) set January 31, 2023 Trial Date, as to Thomas Layman Binford (1), signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 9/6/2022. It is so ordered that the status conferenc e set for September 14, 2022, is vacated. A jury trial is set for January 31, 2023, at 8:30 a.m. before District Judge Ana de Alba. Estimated time of trial is 3-4 days. A trial confirmation is set for January 17, 2023, at 8:3 0 a.m. before District Judge Ana de Alba. It is further ordered that the period of time from September 14, 2022 through January 31, 2023 is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(i) and (iv) because i t results from a continuance granted by the Court at the parties' request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. (Valdez, E)

Use this searchbox to search JudicialCaselaw.com for more interesting court decisions.

USA v. Binford (1:20-cr-00150-ADA-BAM)

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California

Share this with your network