Use this searchbox to search JudicialCaselaw.com for more interesting court decisions.

Chaudhry et al v. Smith et al (1:16-cv-01243-LJO-SAB)

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California

Share on Social Media

Chaudhry et al v. Smith et al (1:16-cv-01243-LJO-SAB)

Follow on Feedly for case updates: follow us on feedly

RSS: RSS Feed Icon

Related Cases: 1:16-cv-01243-SAB

  • ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Terminate Defendant Deidre Kappmeyer as a Party to the Action Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/26/2019. (Jessen, A)

  • ORDER DISREGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL, (Document 57) . Plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal is HEREBY DISREGARDED. Plaintiff shall file a request for dismissal that complies with Rule 41 within five (5) days from the date of entry of this order. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/23/2019. (Timken, A)

  • MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE DEFENDANTS' NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on January 18, 2019. (Doc. 46) (Munoz, I)

  • ORDER RE STIPULATION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:The amended scheduling order filed November 29, 2017 is amended as follows:a. All dispositive motions shall be filed on or before December 7, 2018, with the motion to be set for argument on or before January 8, 2019. The parties are advised that no further modifications to the scheduling order will be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/31/2018. (Hernandez, M)

  • ORDER DISREGARDING (Document 36) Defendant's Request to Modify Scheduling Order re (Document 41) signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/27/2018. (Jessen, A)

  • AMENDED ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE A REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants shall file a reply to Plaintiffs opposition to the request to modify the scheduling order on or before August 24, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/21/2018. (Hernandez, M)

  • ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO FILE AN OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS REQUEST TO EXTEND THE EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINE. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants shall file a reply to Plaintiffs opposition to the request to modify the scheduling order shall be filed on or before August 24, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/20/2018. (Hernandez, M)

  • ORDER Directing Plaintiffs to File an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to Defendant's Request to Extend the Expert Discovery Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 08/17/2018. Five-Day Deadline. (Flores, E)

  • STIPULATION and ORDER to Extend Discovery Deadlines, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 4/6/2018. (Kusamura, W)

  • ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO MODIFYSCHEDULING ORDER (ECF NO. (Document 21) ); ORDER VACATING DECEMBER 1, 2017HEARING, ORDER ADOPTING PARTIES PROPOSEDSCHEDULE AND SETTING NEW DATESAND DEADLINES (ECF NO. (Document 27) ); Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 5/9/2018, Rebutt al 5/23/2018; Non-Expert Discovery due by 4/9/2018, Expert 8/7/2018; Non-Dispositive Motions filed by 8/7/2018; Dispositive Motions filed by 11/8/2018; Pretrial Conference set for 2/12/2019 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill; Jury Trial set for 4/9/2019 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 11/28/2017. (Bernacchi, M)

  • MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER DENYING (Document 7) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss IN ITS ENTIRETY signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/16/2016. Defendants must answer the FAC within twenty-one (21) days. (Jessen, A)

Use this searchbox to search JudicialCaselaw.com for more interesting court decisions.

Chaudhry et al v. Smith et al (1:16-cv-01243-LJO-SAB)

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California

Share this with your network