Use this searchbox to search JudicialCaselaw.com for more interesting court decisions.
Use this searchbox to search JudicialCaselaw.com for more interesting court decisions.
Alabama Aircraft Industries Inc et al v. Boeing Company, The et al (2:11-cv-03577-RDP)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Share on Social Media
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 10/26/20022. (KAM)
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 8/15/2018. (KAM)
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 3/9/2017. (AVC)
ORDER-re: Report and Recommendation (Document 261) . The court hereby ADOPTS the Report and ACCEPTS the recommendations of the Special Master. It is ORDERED that to the extent that Boeing's Motion seeks immediate production of the Requested Documents, t he Motion is DENIED. The motion is GRANTED to the extent that Boeing is entitled to any Requested Documents not covered by the work product doctrine. AAI SHALL produce a privilege log that details the application of the work product doctrine on a document-by-document basis by 2/3/2017. If Boeing wishes to challenge any of AAI's work product assertions, it may do, filing challenges by 2/26/2017. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 1/13/2017. (AVC)
ORDER-re: Report and Recommendation (Document 301) . The court hereby ADOPTS the Report and ACCEPTS the recommendations of the Special Master, with certain deadlines modified by agreement of the parties. It is ORDERED that the Motion to Strike is MOOT. The Motion to Compel is DENIED to the extent that it seeks immediate production of the Disputed Documents; however, Boeing's Motion to compel is GRANTED to the extent that Boeing is entitled to any Disputed Documents not protected by the attorney-c lient privilege and/or the work product doctrine. TCP's Motion to Quash and AAI's Motion to Quash are DENIED to the extent that those Motions seek the wholesale rejection of Boeing's entitlement to the production of the Disputed Docu ments; however, TCP's Motion to Quash and AAI's Motion to Quash are GRANTED to the extent that the Motions seeks to establish that Boeing may be prevented from obtaining some or all of the Disputed Documents because such documents are poten tially protected by the attorney-client privilege and/or the work product doctrine. TCP/AAI is required to produce a supplemental privilege log by 1/13/2017. If Boeing still wishes to challenge any of the renewed assertions, it may do so by filing specific, document-by-document challenges by 2/10/2017. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 1/13/2017. (AVC)
ORDER -RE: Special Master Report and Recommendation (Document 237) . The court hereby ADOPTS the Reports and Accepts the recommendations of the Special Master. It is ORDERED that Boeing's Motion to Compel AAI's Response to Boeing's Interrogatory No. 1 and Requests for Admissions Nos. 6,14,15,16 and 20 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as set out. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 9/8/2016. (AVC)
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Special Master. (Middlebrooks, David)
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Special Master (Middlebrooks, David)
ORDER -re: Report and Recommendation (Document 182) containing the recommendation that Boeing's Motion to Compel Testimony on Topic 5, 20, and 32 of Boeings Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition Notice be granted. The court hereby ADOPTS the Reports of the Special M aster and ACCEPTS the recommendations. It is ORDERED that Boeing's Motion to Compel is GRANTED. AAI SHALL provide corporate testimony in the manner proposed in Boeings Notice (Topic 32) and July 21, 2015 letter (Topics 5 and 20). Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 3/16/2016. (AVC)
ORDER -re: Report and Recommendation of Special Master (Document 176) & (Document 178) . The court ADOPTS the Reports and ACCEPTS the recommendations of the Special Master. It is ORDERED that AAI's Motion for Additional Time to Complete Cross-Examination of Gle nn Hess is GRANTED. AAI will be permitted to continue its cross-examination of Mr. Hess for one-and-a-half hours; if necessary, Boeing may follow with up to one hour of re-direct examination. AAI's Motion to Compel Boeing to Testify is GRANTED. Boeing SHALL comply with AAI's Proposal, with the caveats that AAI will include no more than two hundred document families on List B, and limit its examination questions about those documents (aside from authenticity) to who at Boeing had access to the documents during the relevant period (as opposed to the entire internal transfer history of the documents). Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 2/12/2016. (AVC)
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of Special Master (Middlebrooks, David)
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of Special Master (Middlebrooks, David)
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of Special Master (Middlebrooks, David)
MEMORANDUM OPINION-re: Dfts' Motion to Dismiss Pltf's Second Amended Complaint (Document 39) . Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 3/20/2013. (AVC)
Use this searchbox to search JudicialCaselaw.com for more interesting court decisions.
Alabama Aircraft Industries Inc et al v. Boeing Company, The et al (2:11-cv-03577-RDP)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Share this with your network
Judicial Caselaw
Judicial Caselaw is a resource for publicly available court filings