Use this searchbox to search JudicialCaselaw.com for more interesting court decisions.

Robinson Miller v. Montgomery County Board of Education et al (CONSENT) (2:18-cv-00512-JTA)

U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama

Share on Social Media

Robinson Miller v. Montgomery County Board of Education et al (CONSENT) (2:18-cv-00512-JTA)

Follow on Feedly for case updates: follow us on feedly

RSS: RSS Feed Icon

Related Cases: 2:18-cv-00512-SMD

  • FINAL JUDGMENT: In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered herewith, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the Court as follows: 1. Plaintiff's (Document 123) motion for summary judgment is DENIED; 2. Defendants (Document 125) motion for su mmary judgment is GRANTED as to all claims in the Complaint; 3. All claims against Defendant Montgomery County Board of Education are DISMISSED with prejudice; 4. Counts One, Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, and Seven are DISMISSED without prejudice as t o Defendants Ann Roy Moore, Robert Porterfield, Lisa Keith, W. Durden Dean, Eleanor Dawkins, Mary Briers, Melissa Snowden, Arica Watkins-Smith, Patrick Nelson, and John Johnston, in their official and individual capacities. 5. Counts Eight, Nine, and Ten are DISMISSED with prejudice as to Defendants Ann Roy Moore, Robert Porterfield, Lisa Keith, W. Durden Dean, Eleanor Dawkins, Mary Briers, Melissa Snowden, Arica Watkins-Smith, Patrick Nelson, and John Johnston, in their official and individual capacities; 6. The costs of this action should be taxed as paid; The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Judge Jerusha T. Adams on 10/21/2022. (es, )

  • MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff's (Document 123) motion for summary judgment is DENIED; 2. Defendants' (Document 125) motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; 3. Defendants' (Document 131) motion to amend their summary judg ment brief is GRANTED; 4. All of Plaintiffs claims against Defendant Montgomery County Board of Education are dismissed with prejudice; 5. Counts One, Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, and Seven are dismissed without prejudice as to Defendants Ann Roy Moo re, Robert Porterfield, Lisa Keith, W. Durden Dean, Eleanor Dawkins, Mary Briers, Melissa Snowden, Arica Watkins-Smith, Patrick Nelson, and John Johnston, in their official and individual capacities; 6. Counts Eight, Nine, and Ten are dismissed with prejudice as to Defendants Ann Roy Moore, Robert Porterfield, Lisa Keith, W. Durden Dean, Eleanor Dawkins, Mary Briers, Melissa Snowden, Arica Watkins-Smith, Patrick Nelson, and John Johnston, in their official and individual capacities; 7. A separate judgment shall issue. Signed by Honorable Judge Jerusha T. Adams on 10/21/2022. (es, )

Use this searchbox to search JudicialCaselaw.com for more interesting court decisions.

Robinson Miller v. Montgomery County Board of Education et al (CONSENT) (2:18-cv-00512-JTA)

U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama

Share this with your network